Starry Night
The work of mad man?

Was Vincent Van Gogh insane when he painting his masterpiece, Starry NIght? Let's look at the facts:

We can infer that Van Gogh was certainly very troubled, but in examining the painting, we can't help but marvel at its logical structure. It looks chaotic, but it's really very orderly.

The painting uses two primary colors, yellow (stars) and blue ( sky), to illustrate a starry night. Mix the two colors and you get the green of the village and surroundings. It's a two-color painting.

The landscape is bright, but it's night. We can tell by the yellow lights in the windows--little splashes of light that balance the bright stars in the sky.

This painting is all about balance, harmony, and repetition.

The large cypress tree in the foreground should dominate the painting, but we're drawn to the other elements--the moon, the stars, the swirling sky, and the picturesque village. What's the purpose of the tree?


The wavy, turbulent clouds mimic the sweeping hillsides, and they're like a heavenly figure plunging down from above with outstretched arm. Is this a threat or a protective spirit?




The smooth, rolling hills are nothing like the craggy hills near the asylum. Van Gogh painted this from memory, not from direct observation. He took liberties with everything.


The church, the houses, and the roads are blocky and geometric—the human side of the landscape played against God's landscape with its curves and ambiguities. In Van Gogh's mind, which part is chaos and which part is structured?

The Verdict
So was Van Gogh insane when he painted Starry Night? Some critics say his wild brush strokes and odd shapes indicate that he was a bit loony. I don't think so, Tormented and troubled, yes. Crazy, no!

This painting is well planned and beautifully executed. I think he knew exactly what he was doing.

More books and other things from Amazon. Just click this link: